| The Donor‐conceived Child's ‘Right to Personal Identity’: The Public Debate on Donor Anonymity in the United Kingdom I Turkmendag Journal of Law and Society 39 (1), 58-75, 2012 | 79 | 2012 |
| Eggs, ethics and exploitation? Investigating women’s experiences of an egg sharing scheme E Haimes, K Taylor, I Turkmendag Sociology of Health & Illness 34 (8), 1199-1214, 2012 | 76 | 2012 |
| The removal of donor anonymity in the UK: the silencing of claims by would-be parents I Turkmendag, R Dingwall, T Murphy International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 22 (3), 283-310, 2008 | 73 | 2008 |
| Genome editing: the dynamics of continuity, convergence, and change in the engineering of life P Martin, M Morrison, I Turkmendag, B Nerlich, A McMahon, S de Saille, ... New Genetics and Society 39 (2), 219-242, 2020 | 31 | 2020 |
| It Is Just a “Battery” “Right” to Know in Mitochondrial Replacement I Turkmendag Science, Technology, & Human Values 43 (1), 56-85, 2018 | 15 | 2018 |
| More than research intermediaries: a descriptive study of the impact and value of learned societies in the UK social sciences M Hewitt, R Dingwall, I Turkmendag Science and Public Policy 44 (6), 775-788, 2017 | 15 | 2017 |
| Thinking the unthinkable: how did human germline genome editing become ethically acceptable? PA Martin, I Turkmendag New Genetics and Society 40 (4), 384-405, 2021 | 13 | 2021 |
| Through the thicket and across the divide: Successfully navigating the regulatory landscape in life sciences research G Laurie, SHE Harmon Knowledge, technology and law, 121-136, 2014 | 9* | 2014 |
| The Donor-Conceived Child’s ‘Right to Personal Identity’: The Public Debate on Donor Anonymity in the United Kingdom”(2012) 39 I Turkmendag JL & Soc’y 1, 58, 0 | 7 | |
| When sperm cannot travel: experiences of UK would-be parents seeking treatment abroad I Turkmendag European Law and New Health Technologies, 2013 | 5 | 2013 |
| Home and away: The Turkish ban on donor conception I Turkmendag Law, Innovation and Technology 4 (2), 144-164, 2012 | 5 | 2012 |
| Reinterpreting “genetic identity” in the regulatory and ethical context of heritable genome editing YQ Liaw, I Turkmendag, K Hollingsworth New Genetics and Society 40 (4), 406-424, 2021 | 4 | 2021 |
| Maternal epigenetic responsibility: what can we learn from the pandemic? I Turkmendag, YQ Liaw Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 25 (3), 483-494, 2022 | 3 | 2022 |
| What’s Law got to do with Good Science? I Turkmendag, M Fox, C Thompson, T Murphy Social and Legal Studies, 2019 | 3 | 2019 |
| Kinship: Born and Bred (but also facilitated)? A Commentary on ‘Donor Conception: Ethical Aspects of Information Sharing’(Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London 2013) T Murphy, I Turkmendag Medical law review 22 (3), 422-433, 2014 | 3 | 2014 |
| Exploitation and control of women's reproductive bodies I Turkmendag The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Bioethics, 486-500, 2022 | | 2022 |
| Sins of ‘Women of Childbearing Age’ I Turkmendag Social and Legal Studies, 2021 | | 2021 |
| Blog: Epigenetics, Blaming Mothers, and the Law I Turkmendag Newcastle University, 2021 | | 2021 |
| Body shopping: Challenging convention in the donation and use of bodily materials through art practice L Mackenzie, I Turkmendag, I Burr-Raty, WF Hunter, C Jarvis, M Simun, ... Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research 18 (2-3), 279-297, 2020 | | 2020 |
| What's Law Got to do With Human Germline Editing? A short article for Social & Legal Studies I Turkmendag, T Murphy | | 2019 |
Robert DingwallEmeritus Professor of Sociology, Nottingham Trent UniversityПотвърден имейл адрес: ntu.ac.uk
